As I was walking over to the market today I noticed that the church property is posted for sale.
What's the likelihood that it'd remain a church? Is it governed by the landmark district?
As I was walking over to the market today I noticed that the church property is posted for sale.
What's the likelihood that it'd remain a church? Is it governed by the landmark district?
Hm, that's interesting.
It is in the landmark district. (36th Ave S is basically the sidewalk that runs through the park on the church's east side).
Maybe the market should acquire the property.
DPD has published a notice of application for the Southside Church of Christ, on Edmunds next to Columbia Park — (the west side of the park is technically 36th Ave S).
Contract purchasers for the church are the Northwest Federation of Community Organizations. They want to use the space as their 9-person HQ, where they'll stage trainings and community outreach. The change of use requires Administrative Conditional Use review.
I can't get too excited about this, other than to regret the loss of another church and community mainstay. The comment period runs through December 17, but DPD continues to accept comment until the land use planner drafts his decision.
this is unfortunate, because the application says it will be a community center, but NWFCO is a business, not a community center. This will significantly change the historic district on columbia park. It is misleading to call it a community center. That would actually be a good, thing, similar to the role that the cultural center plays on the north end of the park. But NWFCO is not a community center. The role that the church played in the community was bringing people together who live near hear and a new occupant of that building should do the same thing, not operate a business.
It is unfortunate that so many of our neighborhood's church communities are dwindling or up-and-moving. I like the idea of church, but I don't intend to go, so I guess I'm part of that problem.
At work I get to pore over chapter and verse of another Good Book. Thumbing through Seattle's Land Use Code, my most common question is, "What's the use?" Sometimes it's exasperation, but usually it's a necessary exercise — to figure out how best to characterize what somebody wants to do with their property.
In this case, NWFCO is correctly identified as an institutional use. And as an institution, they're accurately described as a community center. They may not operate exactly like RVCC or the RCC, but the definition fits. Read it for yourself.
This is change — I imagine fewer people will be going through the church doors. But I don't understand the concern that this might significantly change the historic district.
Here's the DPD notice of Decision, where there's another link to the decision itself.
A few things I noted while reading through the decision. I've never reviewed one of these before, so sorry if these observations/queries are lame.
About definitions. I guess I should call NWFCO, but I don't see on their website or on charitynavigator.org any reference to a non-profit status. Can a for-profit operation claim their office to be a community center? Or can any organization (for profit or not) be an Institution?
Interesting.
36th was vacated before it was ever put in, and is now part of the park — you know that sidewalk that runs in front of the houses on the west side of the park? That's where 36th would have been. And yes, the Fifth Church of Christ is the Rainier Valley Cultural Center.
mik
The map on page 2 is of NE 68th St and Roosevelt Way and not the location under discussion. (?)
hmmm… Mr. Janos needs to turn off his "text only" view when he uses existing documents as templates.
"a handful of lots on the west side of 35th are vacant, but in possession of Howland Homes, suggesting that they will be developed to capacity with market-rate housing in the not-distant future." (p2)
Timely site visits are good. But his conclusion is sound!
| Read other recent posts. |